Friday, August 28, 2015

Minnesota Federal Court Rules That Employer Did Not Have to Accommodate Disabled Employee by Excusing Him from Mandatory Overtime Requirements of CBA

August 2015
By: James B. Sherman, Esq.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Minnesota state law require employers to reasonably accommodate disabled applicants and employees. However, many employers overlook the fact that the accommodations to which an employee may by law be entitled, ultimately must enable the employee to adequately perform all of the essential functions of the job in question. In a recent decision a federal court judge in Minnesota dismissed a disability case based on finding that working overtime was an essential function of the job.

EEOC guidelines clearly provide that reasonable accommodations may include restructuring an employee’s work schedule. Sometimes employers misinterpret this to mean that they must always, absent a showing of “undue hardship,” permit a disabled employee to work hours as directed by the employee’s doctor. However, as this particular case demonstrates where an essential function of the job in question requires a particular work schedule, it need not be altered as an accommodation.

Requests for altered work schedules are very common. Whether such accommodations are required for any disabled employee or applicant can depend on details of the particular job and work environment. So before writing a blank pass for a disabled individual to pencil in his or her own work schedule, seek experienced advice on whether it is necessary under the law to do so.


Questions? Call Attorney James Sherman at 952-746-1700 or email jasherman@wesselssherman.com